Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

A prospective double-blind, randomized, and controlled trial was conducted using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis; 54 total hip arthroplasty patients were randomized to receive either highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) or standard ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) liners. The 3-dimensional penetration of the liner was determined over 2 years. For the first 3 months, both polyethylene types had a rapid penetration rate (HXLPE: 0.22 mm, SD = 0.17 mm; UHMWPE: 0.21 mm, SD = 0.15 mm; P = .78). After 3 months, the HXLPE penetration rate (0.06 mm/y, SD = 0.06 mm/y) was significantly lower than the UHMWPE penetration rate (0.10 mm/y, SD = 0.07 mm/y; P = .04). The penetration in the first 3 months was probably caused by creep or bedding in; from 3 months onward, much of the penetration was probably caused by wear. We conclude that HXLPE has a 40% lower wear rate as compared with UHMWPE, suggesting that it will perform better in the long term.

Original publication




Journal article


J Arthroplasty

Publication Date





337 - 343


Aged, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Double-Blind Method, Equipment Failure Analysis, Female, Hip Prosthesis, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Photogrammetry, Polyethylenes, Prosthesis Failure